Sembly AI

Call Recording Laws: One-Party vs. Two-Party Consent In 2025

Call Recording Laws - One-Party and Two-Party Consent - Banner Image

Can you record a call without consent? The short answer is that it depends on your location. Different regions dictate different recording regulations, so knowing yours is no longer an option, but a necessity. No day goes by without phone calls or external meetings, and with this comes the responsibility to meet legal requirements. 

This article examines international, federal, and state regulations to answer the question: What are the audio recording laws?

Understanding Call Recording Laws

So, how do you understand recording laws? What are the legal nuances you are up against? I suggest that we start with the basics and discuss what consent is and how audio recording laws differ depending on the location.

The Basics of Consent

Consent laws determine whether a party can record phone calls or other types of conversations. However, there are always nuances. The US federal law permits it if there is consent from one of the parties, but individual state laws can override this rule with stricter requirements. 

Let’s take a look at two major categories you can come across:

  • One-party consent: To make recording legal, only one person in the conversation must agree, including yourself, as long as you participate.
  • Two-party (or all-party) consent: Unlike a single-party consent states, this one requires agreement from all participants. Otherwise, it is illegal.
Types of Recording Consent: One-Party and All-Party Consent
Source: Sembly AI

What Counts as Consent

What is recording consent to begin with? Consent is a permission from a person to record telephone calls, meetings, or other interactions with them. 

There are two types of consent depending on the participant’s actions:

  • Active consent: A person can click the button or give you a written or verbal consent to recording. The point is that it is obtained through the participant’s actions.
  • Passive consent: Were you ever informed about being recorded, and did you not object? That’s an example of passive consent.

Now that the definition is covered, let’s take a look at examples of valid consent:

  • A message: “This call is being recorded for [your purpose],” followed by the other party continuing the conversation.
  • A click-through agreement.
  • Verbal confirmation: “Yes, I agree to this call being recorded.”

Federal vs. State Laws in the U.S.

In simple words, the U.S. federal wiretap law permits one-party consent for recording oral, wire, or electronic communications. However, states can enforce stricter standards, and in this case, one-party permission is not enough.

Let’s examine what it means in practical examples:

  • If you and other parties are in a one-party state, federal law is likely sufficient.
  • If you are calling across states, the strictest law applies. So, even if you are in a one-party state, you still need to obtain permission from all parties.

One-Party vs. Two-Party Consent States

I have mentioned a few times that states are either one-party or two-party, so what are the actual examples? How do you know which state dictates stricter rules?

A good thing is that most US states require consent from one of the participants only. However, there are a few exceptions to consider.

The key is to align your call recording practices with relevant state laws. Consider whether a respondent is located and whether the one- or two-party consent rule applies.

International Call Recording Regulations

What about international telephone conversations, meetings, or interactions? Surely, call recording laws differ from those in the US? Yes, and the key difference lies in how recordings are treated. Unlike the US, many countries or regions consider this a data protection issue, where heavy penalties follow.

I suggest that we discuss some of the major ones.

European Union and GDPR

Think of recording laws in the European Union similar to two-party consent rules in the US, so you need permission from all involved participants. Under GDPR, recording conversations is considered data processing. The reason? Calls or meetings often include personal information that is recorded, stored, and sometimes analyzed.

Here are the key GDPR recording requirements:

  • Consent must be freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous.
  • Active agreement is required, meaning silence is not enough.
  • People who are recorded must be informed who is recording, why, how long it is stored, and how to withdraw consent.

United Kingdom and Post-Brexit Rules

After Brexit, the UK enforced its version of the GDPR, called the UK-GDPR. However, the principles remained similar: call recording is allowed only when there is a lawful basis.

What do acceptable bases include? Here is a list of 6 ones that are outlined in the UK GDPR:

  • Consent from all parties: Call participants gave their consent to recording a conversation.
  • Legal obligation: You need to process the data to comply with a legal requirement.
  • Vital interest: The data processing can protect someone’s life.
  • Legitimate interest: You have a legitimate reason to process the data, but it doesn’t override the privacy rights of the parties.
  • Contract: You need to process data to fulfill a contract with the individual.
  • Public task: Data processing is necessary for you to perform a task in the public interest or exercise official authority.

Canada and PIPEDA Compliance

Canada protects private recordings under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). According to PIPEDA, you need informed consent to collect any personal information, so overall, the rules remain the same.

Here is what you need to do to comply:

  • Inform participants that the conversation is being recorded.
  • Clearly explain the purpose of the recording.
  • Provide an option to decline or use an alternative.

Australia and State-Specific Variations

Do Australian audio recording laws differ much? Australia’s laws vary by state, but most require two-party consent and are governed by TIA. Recording without permissions can result in criminal penalties even if the recorder participates in the conversation. 

The Northern Territory is one of the “relaxed” states, where consent from one party is enough. However, in South Australia, not obtaining explicit consent from all parties is against the law.

The conclusion is pretty much the same: while there are generally known regulations and practices, it is best to double-check rather than deal with legal consequences later.

Business Use of Call and Meeting Recording

Training, compliance, documentation, or performance management are business goals that can be fueled by meeting transcriptions and recordings. Consider all the information, unique inputs, or feedback voiced during calls—an endless source of knowledge. 

But there are conditions: consent must be clear, storage secure, and usage limited to lawful purposes in all cases. Talking about the examples, let’s discuss the key use cases and general recommendations for each.

Use Cases of Meeting Recordings
Source: Sembly AI

Customer Service and Sales Recordings

Recording customer calls is more like a common practice. One comes with strict duties. Professionals need to clearly inform participants about recording, the reason, and the storage policy, and provide an easy way to opt out. A combination of this ensures you not only gain the customer’s trust but also keep the recording legal.

Here are the main benefits of customer service call recordings:

  • Detect information gaps
  • Identify common pain points
  • Gather customer feedback
  • Track mentions of technical issues
  • Analyze prospects’ expectations and needs
  • Gain insights for customer service performance review
  • Train new incoming agents

HR Interviews and Internal Meetings

Internal meetings are no exceptions to audio recording laws, and the same goes for conversations with HR. The latter ones often record conversations to document evaluations or reduce bias. With informed consent, these discussions not only benefit businesses but also foster trust between colleagues and departments.

Let’s take a look at the key benefits of the recordings:

  • Maintain accurate documentation
  • Ensure legal protection
  • Train newcomers or managers
  • Collaborate with remote employees

Surely, these are only the tip of the iceberg, but with AI, which is the topic of our next section, the number of use cases increases. 

Is Secretly Recording Legal?

An ethical answer is no. However, that’s when conditions for one-party and two-party consent laws differ. 

In one-party consent states, it is legal for you to record phone calls or meetings if you’re an active participant. Your consent is enough. But in two-party consent states, on the other hand, recording approval of all respective parties is against the law.

How about an example to understand conversation consents in the US better? Let’s take a look:

  • One-party consent states: In Rhode Island, for example, recording phone calls is legal as long as you participate in the conversation and give your consent.
  • Two-party consent states: In Washington, recording conversations without informed consent of all participants is illegal.

Consider call recording laws in your location. In a good case scenario, your approval makes it work. Otherwise, you need an active consent from all people involved.

Legal Consequences of Illegal Recordings

How bad can it get if you record phone calls or meetings without approval? What if you forgot about the consent policy at all? Whether it is curiosity or potential legal issues that have you asking the question, I know the answer.

Criminal Charges

I’ll start with an example of the criminal penalties. The Federal Wiretap Act prohibits recording conversations without consent. Breaking the law can result in imprisonment (up to 5 years) and fines. However, one-party consent applies here, meaning if one of the call participants, including you, agreed to the recording, it is not against the law.

Connecticut, on the other hand, follows one-party consent for criminal cases but requires all-party consent to avoid civil liability when recording private phone calls. What does it mean? In the first case, intentionally overhearing or recording conversations if you are not one of the participants is a class D felony. That is up to 5 years of prison time.

Civil Charges

Not every illegal recording results in a class D felony. Sometimes, a party that was recorded without their written or verbal consent can sue for damages to cover emotional distress or reputational harm, for example.

Additionally, a call recording that was obtained without agreement can be dismissed in court. Keep this in mind if you plan to use or refer to recordings in legal cases.

The Role of AI Tools in Recording

Not a day goes by without the AI tools. They help record, transcribe, store meeting data, and more. What’s best is that they make recording easy and efficient. No more forgetting to click the right button, facing technical issues, or having to go through the whole conversation to extract key details.

So, how do AI recording tools improve the process?

  • Reduced manual effort: Forget about manually recording, storing, and transcribing your calls. AI tools automate the process at all stages.
  • Data-driven decisions: Rather than second-guessing, professionals can make informed decisions based on data from the calls. AI can analyze large batches of information and extract core details.
  • Team collaboration: A good AI meeting recorder provides options for collaboration. From sharing a link to granting specific permissions.
  • Searchable records: AI recording software offers a searchable library of meetings. You can always use keyword search and find exactly what you need.

How Sembly Follows Call Recording Laws

Sembly was made to help teams document meetings while maintaining compliance with local and international laws. Recognized by Gartner as an Emerging Visionary in AI tools, Sembly excels in secure and effortless recordings, while giving you control over the process.

Unlike standard AI recorders, Sembly listens to your conversations. Rather than only providing transcripts, it extracts key items, provides summaries, analyzes sentiment, and can generate deliverables. With Sembly, every meeting recording is about value, not text.

Overview of Key Meeting Features Sembly Has to Offer
Source: Sembly AI

So, how do we ensure compliance with regulations?

  • Email notification: Sembly can automatically notify all invitees about the recording 10 minutes before the meeting. 
  • Chat notification: The Sembly agent also sends a notification in the meeting chat, ensuring all participants are aware.
  • Sembly agent visibility: Sembly attends as a participant, so it is visible, and broadcasts in its participant box that the call is being recorded. It can be dismissed as a regular attendee to allay any privacy concerns.
  • Zoom notification: On Zoom calls specifically, Sembly triggers the Zoom Recording Notification, which appears each time a new person joins.
  • Data retention policy: You can configure the workspace data retention policy within your Sembly Account. Set the conditions for data storage and deletion.
  • Secure data handling: Sembly provides enterprise-grade security and is built to support GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, and other compliance frameworks.

Wrapping Up

Consent is more than a checkbox; it is an element of trust. Recording calls and meetings provides value, but only when it’s done within the call recording laws. The key? Make consent the foundation of your recording practices. With a trusted AI recording app, you can optimize the recording results and stay compliant with regulations. Choose tools that are built with privacy, transparency, and security as their core, and recordings will become a tool to benefit your business. 

I hope this article has answered the main question: how to record a phone call legally. Good luck with your conversations!

FAQ

Can I record a phone call without permission from all participants?

Yes, if you and the call participants are located in one-party consent states. In this case, permission from one attendee, including yourself, is enough to make a recording legal. For cross-state or international conversations, consider the strictest call recording laws and align accordingly.

For example, if you are from a one-party state, but the other participant is from a two-party state or another country, one-party call recording laws will not work. 

Is it illegal to record a phone call in the US?

You can record conversations in the US, but exact audio recording laws depend on the state. One-party consent states permit recording discussions if one participant, including yourself, gives their permission. 

However, in two-party consent states, you need to get permission from all participants in the call. Otherwise, the recording is illegal.

What are the tips for recording conversations?

There are 5 key tips to record conversations in a legal and ethical way:

  1. Always check federal, state, and international call recording laws before the meeting or a call.
  2. Clearly inform participants about the recording and give them options to decline.
  3. Offer alternatives in case a participant chooses to refuse recording a conversation.
  4. Keep recordings secure and never share them without permission.
  5. Record only the information you need.

What call recording laws apply in the UK?

The UK governs data, including information from conversations, under UK-GDPR. 6 legal bases allow you to record calls: consent from all parties, legal obligation, vital interest, legitimate interest, contract, or a public task.

Overall, the principles are similar to the standard GDPR: call recording is allowed only when there is a lawful basis.